re:Takk! :)Modificare

:) Vaya, te veo en todas partes, muchas gracias por tu trabajo :* :* :*

--pulju (:> )=| 12:25, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

re: â -> ãModificare

Hello Piolinfax! Regarding Aromanian spelling: you adhere to the convention of using ã instead of both â, ă. There is no definitive set of spelling rules ... the Bitule 1997 Symposium is a worthy tentative but by no means the ultimate word on it. Pls see my comments. I'm stuck. I'll ask people more knowledgeable than me on this matter, so there's still hope :). Regards, --Doruuu 21:54, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

roa-rup templatesModificare

Hello, pls check my answers. In short: I added a few templates, and yes I agree on being tolerant on spellings (accepting what the author considers it's right in cases such 'â' vs 'ă' vs 'ã', possible other cases).

more translation & othersModificare

Hello, pls check my answers.In short: There are 2 Aromanian spelling conventions currently in use: Bitule 97 and Romanian-like conventions. Bitule '97 uses ã while Romanian-like uses â and ă. Let's support them both. Also: how about switching from 'roa-rup' to 'rup'?